Replies

I don't know who wrote the Wall St Journal article you posted but it is dang near unreadable. And for a reason, I think.

For example:Almost immediately after the FBI’s first contacts with Tsarnaev became known, Russia insisted that they tried to warn the US about him, and that the FBI didn’t respond to them. The FBI now claims the same thing about Russian intelligence”

Then they say:The FBI interview was conducted at Russia’s request...So, the FBI is claiming that Russia didn't warn them, they just requested that he be interviewed? What? So the FBI interviewed him, cause the Russians asked, but they never asked the Russkies why they needed to do the interview?

‘Russia insisted that they tried to warn the US about him, and that the FBI didn’t respond to them. The FBI now claims the same thing about Russian intelligence”

The FBI now claims the same thing? What was that? According to how this is written, the FBI tried to warn the Russians? About what since they supposedly didn't know anything.

This is not the first article I've read which is all over the map and makes no sense. Someone is definitely trying their best to hide the ball. And, they will probably get away with it.

The fact is, and the best I can tell from what I have read: The FBI interviewed Tsarnaev. That they aren't denying. At this time. But they seem to be denying that they had any idea he had terrorist ties? So, why in the hell would they be interviewing him?

Heck, I'm confusing myself. And that's what they want.

Someone is definitely trying their best to hide the ball.

See tag line below.

And no, they won't get away with this. Too many dead, too maimed for life, too many victims demanding answers from these people.

They know exactly what occurred here. This isn't rocket science and #1 and #2 were clearly not very sophisticated.

The big question is:

Where's Obama's news conference demanding Homeland Security Secretary Janet resign?

At minimum this should happen before the sun goes down in D.C.

Part of your response below probably best answers your question:

“The fact is, and the best I can tell from what I have read: The FBI interviewed Tsarnaev. That they aren’t denying. At this time. But they seem to be denying that they had any idea he had terrorist ties? So, why in the hell would they be interviewing him?

Heck, I’m confusing myself. And that’s what they want.”