[Cindy of Nashville]

It's a shame, but it seems like Obama could have a pit bull fighting arena in the basement of the white house, be the head of an international child porno ring, could be kidnapping and selling white, blond little girls to his friends in Africa, be the owner of a secret poppy plantation in Indonesia and the media here would cover for him and try to hide it. I can't imagine anything Beck has that the media will pay attention to. We are all in the twilight zone!

[ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton]

Bingo! If there were a video of him robbing a bank, the media would just say: “He was trying to redistribute wealth a little more directly”.

[Mark17]

I can't imagine anything Beck has that the media will pay attention to. We are all in the twilight zone!

If Beck has some dirt on Obama, the Media will consider it a feather in his cap, and a resume enhancer.

[Sivad]

The only remotely possible reason the media MIGHT turn on
Obama is if some of college papers turned up. No, I don’t
mean papers that would reveal his true place of birth nor his
scholarship deficiencies. No, the only possible way the media
would turn on the Bamster is if someone exposed a research
paper he had written (or forged) which was critical of the
late, great newsman icon, Edward R Murrow. To media morons,
Murrow is a “Founding Father”.