Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: demshateGod
Liberals, who hate the constitution, like to bring up the supremacy clause without actually reading what it says.

I disagree with you so you're a liberal! Waah! Waah!

The purpose is not to prevent states from reacting to fed overreach, but to guarantee every citizen has the constitutional rights protected.

And - where, exactly - do you see that written in the Supremacy Clause?

16 posted on 04/18/2013 10:19:26 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: gdani

I’m just “pointing out a fact”. Liberals love your version of the supremacy clause. It’s just not the actual version. You should be happy that you’re wrong about this.

Just read it. That’s all I ask.


18 posted on 04/18/2013 10:24:43 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: gdani
"And - where, exactly - do you see that written in the Supremacy Clause?"

Right here Ill underline it for you:

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; " Most acts of congress are not made in pursuance of the Federal Constitution as the Federal constitution say nothing whatsoever on the matter. * An act of nullification is really nothing more than a deceleration by the sovereign authority of the State that a given Federal act is a transgression against the reserved rights of the people & their states in violation of Federal constitution, and therefore invalid. This is done in pursuance to the oath of State legislatures take to uphold the Federal constitution

* Acts of interposition are also in pursuance to the oath of State legislature to uphold the Federal constitution. But they go further than mere nullification in that they recognizes the need for the State act to protect the rights of it's citizens from the progress of this evil.

Once again I remind you this oath is the exact same oath that the Federal government's employees in black robes claimed as the foundation of their own power to nullify unconstitutional Congressional & executive act in Madison vs Marbury. If the Federal court has this power & responsibly then so to does every official that takes the oath in their respective capacities. The big difference is our State Legislators have the Sovereign authority of the States. The same sovereign authority that created the Federal Constitution in the first place. This makes them morally superior to the Federal government's hand picked employees in black robes. In addition to that their capacities to resist is also far greater than the federal court as they control the domestic armies of the State(police force) as well as the militia should they take the responsible act and reassert said control over Militia by purging the officer core.

34 posted on 04/18/2013 4:10:01 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson