[[If they were truly honoring the oaths they gave they would introduce nothing at the federal level. Once background checks were introduced the qualifying criterion was changed and they began to include a broader reange of disqualifying criterion. Now misdeameanor crimes are used to deny ownership and possession and crimes of that nature, which happened decades ago with no further incidents in the persons history to warrant a denial, are being used to deny them their right! These guys are further opening the can of worms!]]
Sir you hit it right on the head- ANY record- no matter how insignificant,whether itr be petty larceny, hittign someoen in high school, actign like a bully on playground, shoving spouse to protect youurself whiel spouse goes berzerk- then havign them report you aS THE agressor etc- will mark a person as a ‘potential risk’ and ANY case where a person may have temporarily suffered nervous breakdowns, depression, anxiety, attention deficit disorder etc will mark you are ‘untrustworthy’ and ‘not stable enough to own a gun’ by the left
THIS IS WHY the right shoudl have NEVER allowed thsi to even coem to a vote and WHY the right should NOT be puttign forth ANY new gun biulls at ALL- We have enoguyh laws o nthe books, and hte right shoudl be hammerign this FACT home to the public and stating that the left has FAILED to uphold those laws, and now are tryign to blame innocent law abidign citizens and the right shoudl be holdign oen press cofnerence after5 another statign that whiel the left are desperately tryign to vioalte the people’s 2n’d amendment rights, the right would NOT be a party to such anti-Aemricanism
I harken back to Atlas Shrugged and the words of Ayn Rand regarding the plethora of laws and regulations being promulgated by these gentlemen. We will all be criminals if this continues. The illogic boggles the mind.