Benghazi: Unaware, Unresponsive, Unaccountable

youtube ^ | 4/10/13 | OPSECTeam

[Nachum]

Nearly seven months after the Benghazi attacks there are still more questions than answers about the Obama Administration's response. Time is running out to find the truth. Absent a special investigation, the American people will never discover the truth about why Americans were simply left to die in Benghazi.

More than 70 House Republicans have cosponsored H. Res. 36 to create a Select Committee on the Terrorist Attack in Benghazi - but more than 160 still haven't signed on.

We need your immediate help to contact Members of Congress and urge them to join OPSEC's effort today at www.opsecteam.org.

Use of military ranks, titles & photographs in uniform does not imply endorsement of the Dept of the Army or the Department of Defense. All individuals are no longer in active service with any federal agency or military service.

[Count of Monte Fisto]

You’re forgetting that SOS Hillary should not have posted this diplomatic mission to an unstable and American unfriendly nation without more than sufficient security in the form of Embassy Marines

Embassies and consulates are known to the host government and must be made public by flying their countries flag or displaying its seal. The villa in Benghazi not an official embassy or consulate but was, in fact, a secret CIA command base being used to ship guns to Al Qaeda terrorist mercenaries in Syria. Calling it an embassy is propaganda to manipulate public perception of the event, a psyop similar to how the Feds and the Corporate Media constantly referred to the Branch Davidian church in Waco as a compound and their storm shelter as a bunker. Having security at the villa would draw too much attention to the fact that it was being used as a secret CIA command base.

[Forty-Niner]

Well evidently everyone knew of its existence. Still there were NO Marines available to guard any of the diplomatic mission no matter their location or their purpose. Hillary needs to hung out to dry on that point by itself.....right next to the Creep in Chief.....

[Yosemitest]

To Moderator:

WHY did you remove post number 12 when that same post was approved by the Sidebar Moderator ?

To no-to-illegals:

I recommend
HTML Sandbox 2008

and A guide to using HTML on Free Republic in 5 lines

Be sure to use the "preview" function before you click on "post".

[Yosemitest]

To Moderator:

WHY did you remove post number 12 when that same post was approved by the Sidebar Moderator ?

[Yosemitest]

To Moderator:

WHY did you remove post number 12 when that same post was approved by the Sidebar Moderator ?

[miserare]

Thanks for this thread. We must never forget what happened at Benghazi, and how our President did absolutely NOTHING to save our agents there.

IMPEACH! IMPEACH!! IMPEACH!!!

[Jim Robinson]

Here’s the moderator’s note on the pulled post:

“del #12 too large “excerpts” of WND, Fox News, plus AP photos, Getty Images”

Do not post getty images. Do not post substantial portions of copyrighted articles.

DO NOT RE-POST PULLED POSTS!

[Yosemitest]

Look at it again, because the getty image was pulled, and linked to. "Substantial portions of copyrighted articles"?
All that was posted was the wording under the pulled image.

[Jim Robinson]

So you knew why it was pulled? Then why all the drama? And why all the spam? No one likes spam.

[Yosemitest]

No, I didn't know why it was pulled.
I worked with the Sidebar Moderatoron Sunday April 07, 15:15:57 GMT-0500 with comment number 40
and I had already posted the top portion of that post in comment #34 of Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’.
There was several e-mail to me to get it right from the Sidebar Moderator.

You can check my mail to see them, in the inbox, and they're the top three mails.

[Jim Robinson]

If you’re already working with a mod and know where you’re going wrong, why pester me with it? Why the drama?

[Yosemitest]

Because one moderator says the post is okay, yet another moderator pulls the same post?
Which is it?
Is it okay or not?
What's the point in getting all that proof that Obama intentionally turned his back on Benghazi, and getting the post approved, if another moderator has different rules?

[Jim Robinson]

If it has AP or Getty images it’s obviously not ok. If it has long passages from copyrighted articles, it’s not ok. And why post a bunch of spam anyway?

[Yosemitest]

All those links are proof of Obama's TREASON.
Why do I even try?
Never mind.

[Jim Robinson]

Well, if you have something real on Obama’s treason, post it as a thread. Don’t spam. No one likes or even reads spam.