Where were all the “two citizen parents and born on U.S. soil” advocates BEFORE 0bama was elected in 2008? Why was this such an unknown point of view on one of the preminent conservative and Constitution advocacy locations on the internet if so many NOW claim it was something they were taught in High School? Where are the textbooks advancing this claim that they were taught from?
And when, in Article I, it mentions that one must be a U.S. “citizen” to be a Senator - that is not it’s own category as should be obvious to all but a moron. It is inclusive of all three categories. We have had naturalized citizens as Senators, we have had natural born citizens as Senators, and we have had those who were citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution as Senators. The intention was not that only a ‘generic’ “citizen” would qualify - any of the THREE types of U.S. citizen mentioned in the U.S. Constitution could qualify.
I take history to show that there was little public concern about citizen eligibility for POTUSA because elections were generally above board. However this was skewed by Obama enablers especially Polosi in the certification procedures/process. I recognize that most all of the politicians and talk people do not recognize that that things were in any way done wrongly. However, as a free spirit along with many others, I use my own sense of facts to weigh that something has gone awry with Obama’s candidacy and election. The ‘what’ is becoming more apparent each and every day. The ‘why’ remains perhaps for future historians. Until then I will probably continue to hold that Obama is a usurper of the USA Constitution. Just plain logic apart from being a moron tells me, and many others, that there are two distinct and separate kinds of citizens in/between Article I and Article II of the Constitution. A moron can see a difference of wording but a iconoclast might not.