Fortunately for America, Hillary appears to be in fairly poor overall health herself.
Lately the drive by shootings in Chicago have been killing more 6 year old girls this year, instead of the usual 5 year olds we saw a year ago. This is 20% improvement.
We may as well throw our hands in the air and ask, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”
1. Americans are a highly mobile population. Most people don't live in the same place their whole lives. The women in a given county at the beginning of the survey period are not the same women at the end of the survey period.
2. The period of the survey was a period of high levels of immigration. Women at the end of the survey period were not even in America at the beginning of the survey period.
3. There is no accounting for lifestyle issues. Nothing about smoking, drug use etc.
4. There is no accounting for socioeconomic level of the women.
5. There is no accounting for genes and their influence on lifespan. There is no comparison of women's lifespan and their parent's lifespan.
5. It is assumed that there is some flaw in the medical care available in the U.S. The assumption in the write up is medical care for women has gotten worse.
The only thing that breaks my heart about this is the researchers dishonesty.
This was from the comments on the article. This is clearly a phony study to promote a political agenda.
Are they including stats on females in the womb? Cause I hear its getting a lot worse for them.
Quotes from that hag are to be dismissed, she being a major filthy liar anyway
Workplace stress?
This may indicate that, after all, a woman’s place is in the home.
“especially those with the least education”. Sounds like more money will be dumped into educating the non educatable Just take a look at where mortality rates are celebratory, ny, california, massachusettes, vermont, connecticut and new hampshire. WOW these rats are really doing a great job for women in these democratically controlled strongholds
The change in mortality rate which is nothing more than deaths per 100,000 would be expected to increase as the distribution of the population continues to shift to an older population.
Therefore it is typical of the political scientist to draw conclusions from a statistic which is taken out of context and is in wrong as to the cause. Political scientist all have a political agenda.
http://www.nationmaster.com/country/us/Age_distribution
Mrs. Clinton, what difference does it make?
This does not surprise me at all...
"least education" is semantics for school drop out, baby mommas, obese, smoking, Cheetos munching, Mountain Dew big gulp guzzling women of all races...who can't cook a healthy decent meal if their life depending on it
They are just waiting to be a health train wreck later in life...dying early and an expensive death..
female mortality
the huge number of children born out of wedlock (72%?)indicates that lifestyle is a contributing factor.
with the exception of the upper Midwest, it looks like a map of the black population of the US.
Government handouts and unemployment benefits and government employment are in the blue counties. The red ones are the ones footing the bills. No wonder the stress levels are rising.
The mortality rate for men is almost always higher than that of women, but this seems to escape these researchers
No doubt, this is the Republicans’ fault. When Hillary runs, she will promise eternal life to all women who vote for her. And she’ll win because there are so many pathetically gullible women in the USA.
The link does not now work.
You can thank feminism for that. These days a woman has to be mother, father, sole provider for too many families. Often with NO emotional support from anyone.