Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat

In early feudalism, it was pretty close. Feudal society was just gangs of armed men holding strong points. Most realized they needed serfs to grow food for them and their horses, so they had to protect their property (serfs) that were bound to the land. They had almost no restraints on their actions.

During the late medeival period, the church had some influence, but not very much.


44 posted on 04/04/2013 5:12:01 PM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain; supercat

“...Feudal society was just gangs of armed men holding strong points. Most realized they needed serfs to grow food for them and their horses...”

As feudalism evolved it became a very complicated patchwork of serfs, freed, and indentured farmers and tradesmen governed by guilds and the nobles. The nobles had their sphere, the clergy theirs, and people theirs. By the late medeival people generally guarded their ‘rights’ and privileges accumulated over generations. Very facinating.

Totalitarian anarchy = despotism to me. This is what tyranny looks like.


63 posted on 04/04/2013 7:52:16 PM PDT by Owl558 (Think twice before speaking once)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson