Skip to comments.
U.S. would seek regime change in North Korea if attack occurs
Washington Times ^
| 4/4/13
| Rowan Scarborough
Posted on 04/04/2013 11:40:47 AM PDT by illiac
The U.S. would oust the communist regime in North Korea if it uses its nuclear weapons or launches an all-out invasion on South Korea and the 28,500 American troops stationed there, national security sources say.
The Obama administration has not articulated such a far-reaching retaliation, even as North Korean leader Kim Jong-un threatens to attack both the South Korean and the U.S. mainland.
But national security sources say it is a common assumption within the Pentagon and U.S. Pacific Command that a full-force attack by Pyongyang would put in place a contingency plan of massive retaliation against the North aimed at bringing down the Stalinist regime. President Obama then would be faced with making the war decision.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhoasia; governmentnews; kn08musudan; korea; nkorea; northkorea; regimechange; scarborough; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
"...President Obama then would be faced with making the war decision..."
Doubt if he has the cajones...
1
posted on
04/04/2013 11:40:47 AM PDT
by
illiac
To: illiac
I didn’t realize the Muslim Brotherhood was in Korea.
2
posted on
04/04/2013 11:42:10 AM PDT
by
ponygirl
(Be Breitbart.)
To: illiac
If he did and we win he will win re election in 2016
3
posted on
04/04/2013 11:42:39 AM PDT
by
al baby
(Hi Mom)
To: illiac
What about a regime change in the US?
4
posted on
04/04/2013 11:43:17 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: illiac
"U.S. would seek regime change in North Korea if attack occurs" Fat lot of good that will do for the dead. Take the communist idiot out now!! (no, not that one).
5
posted on
04/04/2013 11:43:55 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!n)
To: illiac
Doubt if he has the cajones... You do?
6
posted on
04/04/2013 11:44:06 AM PDT
by
tsowellfan
(www.cafenetamerica.com)
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: illiac
No doubt in my mind. We have “sacklessjaweea” running round trying to disarm us law abiding victims. No time for Psy’s twin bro kim jong dung. Hell, we need regime (and I do mean “regime”)change right here at home. Maybe kim jong dung should have held dennis rodman for ransom.
8
posted on
04/04/2013 11:44:47 AM PDT
by
rktman
(BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST MR. PRESIDENT!(not that we'd get the truth!))
To: dfwgator
What about a regime change in the US?
We need one much more than they do. They are merely facing the loss and destruction of that shitty little starving country of theirs.
9
posted on
04/04/2013 11:47:48 AM PDT
by
ZX12R
(Never forget the heroes of Benghazi, who were abandoned to their deaths by Obama)
To: Jim Robinson
Fat lot of good that will do for the dead. Take the communist idiot out now!! (no, not that one). Obama promised NEVER to use nukes. That's likely how we got this far in the first place.
Obama sees an attack on our West Coast as an opportunity to lower the unemployment rate. The draft always does that.
This kid is a nutcase. He may not have the missiles to reach the US but at the very least he can try to attack South Korea in one way or another.
10
posted on
04/04/2013 11:49:07 AM PDT
by
tsowellfan
(www.cafenetamerica.com)
To: illiac
Our Dear Leader's Leader would be suitable to lead a communist regime
11
posted on
04/04/2013 11:51:20 AM PDT
by
TSgt
(The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.)
To: illiac; Bender2
RE: “President Obama then would be faced with making the war decision.”
Oh really? Wonder what the Constitution says about that?
12
posted on
04/04/2013 11:52:48 AM PDT
by
big'ol_freeper
("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
To: illiac
Dont worry about China. If they let it happen, its their problem, he said. They are not going to war. China is not going to throw in a hundred thousand troops. China has got to keep this guy on a short leash. China is making so much money. They dont want ill will around the world, trade embargoes. Its not in their interest. Don't bet on it. China is still run by communists, and they always think in terms of power. They like having a weak and pliant puppet on their border.
13
posted on
04/04/2013 11:54:11 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: illiac
If such an attack did take place the U.S. response would be a sternly worded letter followed by an apology to N. Korea.
14
posted on
04/04/2013 11:58:11 AM PDT
by
Wordkraft
(Remember who the Collaborators are.)
To: tsowellfan
He wouldn’t have to use a nuke to take the idiot out.
15
posted on
04/04/2013 11:58:32 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!n)
To: Wordkraft
Seem to be the status quo, doesn’t it....
16
posted on
04/04/2013 11:59:07 AM PDT
by
illiac
(If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
To: big'ol_freeper
Maybe I’m wrong, but there hasn’t been a Congressional declaration of War since the 1940’s. So I’m guessing that whatever the Constitution says doesn’t count for jack shit at this point.
17
posted on
04/04/2013 11:59:19 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: illiac
“Korean spring”.
If we had, quite literally, ANY other President in our history to make that choice I’d be okay with it. Even Carter, previously the worst President of my lifetime.
But Baraq Obama could screw up a one-car funeral.
18
posted on
04/04/2013 11:59:34 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(Blather. Reince. Repeat.)
To: illiac
Really?
And what will we do when the 24,000,000 souls, having been trapped in a concentration for 50 years, start rushing southward in search of a decent meal?
We are going to be in deep kimchee, that’s what.
Face it, we are going to have to leave the little bastard there or see South Korea over run with refugees looking for a better life.
19
posted on
04/04/2013 12:02:06 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: illiac
I have a feeling the NK military is working on regime change right now. Thats why Kim Jung Un is acting out.
20
posted on
04/04/2013 12:02:41 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson