Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freeangel
You guys have it wrong. I think she is angry because she was mislead into having the abortion...carrying the baby would threaten her life. It also seems she is suing in pursuit of vengeance of those who tried to take her baby. She seems very disgusted with abortion and the clinic. She should sue and every women who has had an abortion should sue. Even though she has to sue because her baby wasn't aborted the lawsuit is useful in the defense of life and could possibly help close an abortion mill. Every pregnant women who reads about this will have another reason to not kill her baby.
28 posted on 04/04/2013 8:53:01 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomNotSafety
Yes, here's hoping that some good can come out of this:

Knight’s attorney, James J. Gutbrod, who the Beacon Journal describes as being staunchly pro-life, said the lawsuit is a malpractice claim that alleges the clinic and the abortionists failed to follow an acceptable standard of care.

“From Ariel’s description, you can see how poorly the clinic is run and how different it [abortion] is from any other medical procedure that’s done in our country,” Gutbrod said. “The way they do things is horrendous.”

It is unconscionable that abortions are done with less oversight of individuals and facilities, and less reporting, than less invasive, less dangerous procedures.

31 posted on 04/04/2013 2:09:47 PM PDT by cyn (Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson