To: haffast
""Congratulations, Mr. Starr! As a result of your callous disregard for cherished constitutional rights, you may have succeeded in unmasking a sexual relationship between two consenting adults.""No, it was an affair between a married PRESIDENT of the USA and a relative child intern, which could have all kinds of national security concerns- if the louse-in-chief was not already a known womanizer.
Oh, and there was that pesky thing about lying under oath and many mysterious 'arkancides' - and the death of 2 former clinton bodyguards at Waco by 'friendly fire'
2 posted on
04/03/2013 8:41:40 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
To: Mr. K
I hope the pinheaded moron of a LIB loser attorney rests in peace.
4 posted on
04/03/2013 8:43:16 AM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: Mr. K
which could have all kinds of national security concerns- if the louse-in-chief was not already a known womanizer. Commander in Chief Clinton deployed troops on the phone while receiving oral sex from Ms. Lewinsky. The security breech did not just encompass the risk of blackmail.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson