Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper
The only thing he apologized for was using NAMBLA and beastiality in the sentence as if equating those with same sex civil unions, which he said was not his intent.

His primary point was that NO group ('gay', straight or otherwise) should get the right to change the definition of marriage. And he went on to effectively support that exact point under the hostile questioning of Andrea Mitchell.

20 posted on 03/29/2013 2:54:11 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the Cross

He shouldn’t have apologized. Disappointed that he did. I have said the same and yes, have discussed the same incest and bestiality issues with those lobbying for same sex marriage on Facebook. I will continue to do so and I will not apologize for it! Come on, conservatives, get your game on!


35 posted on 03/29/2013 3:07:39 PM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

Soooo. what IS the difference between NAMBLA , beastiality and Homosexual sex?? It’s ALL DEVIANT!!


103 posted on 03/31/2013 8:44:42 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson