Replies

What I intend to do is start locally. I am going my town clerk and I am going to test these voting machines. What happened in my home town was simply amazing and I still can’t believe it. But I will spare you the details but I can tell you that all these machines are easily tampered with and we need to get them examined and once proven to be fraudulent removed in favor of some other form of voting. Before 2014!

I laud your initiative in regard to testing voting machines, GregNH. Electronic hacking is a form of voting fraud and cheating that is rarely discussed, even in forums such as ours. Yet it can easily have the largest numerical impact on the reported vote, because it can alter the counting thousands of votes in one action. It appears as if the Obama campaign and its agents were doing electronic hacking of voting equipment targeted specifically to the swing states, of which New Hampshire is obviously one. That kind of fraud can easily account for the significant differences between pre-election polling by usually more reliable pollsters (e.g., Rasmussen) in these states and the reported election returns.

No wonder why Romney campaign operatives were reported to be "shellshocked" when the results came in on election night: they had no inkling that they were going to be blindsided by such egregious cheating, cheating that can be done most efficiently through electronic hacking. People that play the game by the rules sometimes have no clue as to what their sleazy opponents are capable of doing to harm them.

http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Harris-County-officials-scramble-after-voting-1695734.php

Two and a half years later and no one has been brought to justice for burning up the new electronic voting machines in Houston, TX.