Thus those who resort to such statutory law only further emphasis the point that the person they're supporting with such usage isn't a natural born citizen and they only seek to confuse the issue.
My intent is to use the code section I posted
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401
to show 0 fits into a STATUTORY category.
And therefore CANNOT be a natural born citizen.
See #813.
Also in no way do I support the Usurper-in-Thief; I’m supporting my position that he definitely is NOT a natural born citizen
If a book is entitled “Cats and Dogs,” is the book only about cats? When the title is “Aliens and Nationality” it distinquishes between who, though resident in America is an alien and who possesses American nationality. Those who are not aliens but rather are “Nationals and Citizens of the United States at Birth” is defined in a Section 1401.