“I doubt that would happen. I think they would rely on Hawaii. Even if you think the birth certificate is a fake, then it’s clear that any such fake would have to have been done with the cooperation of the Hawaii Department of Health.”
Judge Carter said that, but a state BC is only prima facie evidence that can be challenged in a trial on the merits, which has never occurred.
Sheriff Arpaio’s posse has stated that they have evidence that HI DOH is colluding in a criminal conspiracy to conceal the forgery of Barry’s LFBC. Looking at the available evidence and “tells,” I concur. (I am a retired Certified Fraud Examiner).
Numerous governors and state officials are in jail for criminal conspiracies including Barry’s long-time IL governor pal, and HI is one of the most corrupt states in the union, IIRC.
It would be very difficult to challenge that.
Sheriff Arpaio’s posse has stated that they have evidence that HI DOH is colluding in a criminal conspiracy to conceal the forgery of Barry’s LFBC. Looking at the available evidence and “tells,” I concur. (I am a retired Certified Fraud Examiner).
Arpaio's posse claimed they had evidence from a very specific US government manual that proved the birth certificate was a fraud. When a real copy of the exact manual they claimed to have actually turned up, it didn't say what they claimed it said at all.
You can't mistake something like that. Either the manual said what they claimed, or it didn't. And it turned out that it didn't.
So something is very, very fishy there.