http://www.linkedin.com/in/tstanley
Thanks again Ray. It is noteworthy that so many whose lives and success depend upon freedom to be entrepreneurial do not see how their success depends upon the freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution. Stanley a bit engineer and a bit lawyer, doesn't seem to understand that being ruled by a Castro or Chavez will constrain his freedoms too.
He is plugged into GE, Nolo, and certainly, Soros’ political empire. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuiytrzxFsE&feature=player_embedded His role at findlaw seems incongruous, since Findlaw didn't corrupt cases citing Minor v. Happersett. A guess is that Findlaw’s revenue is based upon being a trustworthy source, and is fee-based. There are other fee-based services, competing and waiting in the wings. If he asked, they didn't dare; but he probably knows better than to have asked.
Stanley is an achiever who is helping cement tyranny, and must assume he will benefit from it. Unlike Obama, he has never known hardship. Obama learned about hardship when he decided to become an American Black to further his political ends (a description from Khalid al-Mansour, lawyer to Alwaleed bin-Talal, Obama’s mentor). Of course, Obama lived in High Park, near Louis Farrakhan, and never wanted for anything, but he saw enough to help cement his future as a disciplined con man.
The technology Stanley is pushing is trivial. His market is repackaging legal information, probably because LexisNexis is too expensive for many law students, and for many small law firms. His edge is his energy as a marketer, since few lawyers know much about the technology. He sells his connections to the government, many of which com through Malamud. Using Soros’ money, he has made lots of connections. Of course, free access to government documents is not a big revenue generator, which may warrant a hard look at Soros Center for American Progress underwriting. Did Jusia get Tarp money? I'm betting that many of his potential partners, knowing how important it is to regarded as trustworthy, are steering away from him.
The Berkeley Professor, Robert Berring, has Tim's number. Would you want to establish a business relationship with someone willing to put his clients at risk by intentionally corrupting his key product? Their businesses depend upon our laws, still based upon a foundation of The Constitution. He is involved in subverting them. Obama will be gone some day, and the wreckage will be substantial. Stanley has damaged his brand.
It amazes me that Stanley's career, one free legal web site after another, has apparently not been thwarted by his willing corruption of legal documents he secured from the US government. Any lawyer who cited case law from one of Stanley's sites would be taking the chance of losing the case for his client, which could end a career, or at least, be very costly. Stanley knew this. He chose to be guided by his progressive political affiliations, which have probably rewarded him generously. Our society still sees lying as wrong, unlike Muslims who ordain lying in the name of religious domination. Stanley isn't a Muslim?