Seizethecarp,
How does the divorce of SADO and BHO SR figure in to this?
(Your post for reference;
“....The “5 years after the age of 14” only applies if the parents are married. Any US residence at all and any age of the mother will entitle the baby of a single US citizen mother delivered in a foreign country to have US nationality at birth,IIRC. That wouldn’t meet the Minor v. Happersett NBC standard or even the jus soli standard,of course,but it would meet the Marguet-Pillado dicta standard (which was cited I the Congressional Research Office paper on NBC status,BTW).
My reading of Kenya colonial marriage act and Hawaii marriage law in 1961 points to Stanley Ann’s marriage to BHO Sr. as being bigamous in both Kenya and Hawaii due to a tribal (not Muslim) marriage to Kezia. ...”
“How does the divorce of SADO and BHO SR figure in to this?”
If a bigamous marriage is a nullity, then the divorce is a nullity, too! The marriage did not legally exist. The INS FOIA documents show that the INS in 1961 was already suspicious that the marriage was bigamous and fully intended to challenge it themselves if BHO Sr. tried to use the “marriage” to gain a green card.
I believe that Barry’s legal team already shows signs of expecting that Barry will be discovered at some point to have been born in Kenya. The did this by citing the CRO citation of Marguet-Pillado (in Apuzzo’s case in NJ?). Maybe the birth documents referred to in the secret Kenyan gov’t letters that are published in Corsi’s book will turn up (for the right price).
If Barry is shown to have a Kenyan birth, his lawyers will be FIRST to claim he is the bastard child of legally single Stanley Ann and leap to embrace the Marquet-Pillado dicta. The legal roadmap is already there.