“Surprisingly, Donofrio’s criticism here has some merit.
“I wouldn’t exactly call it “scrubbing,” though. I would call it a correction. And I think Solum explained himself well enough, although I would go farther than his footnote.”
It is surprising to you because you, apparently, are not familiar with Donofrio’s body of work.
Solum’s original article was peer reviewed.
Solum’s “correction” was NOT. Solum’s political motivation to attempt to “correct” his article is obvious.
No, it's surprising because I've read quite a bit of Donofrio's word, and so much of it was based on fallacy.