If you people have any actual evidence instead of meaningless ad hominem attacks. this would be a good time to present it.
And I’m not talking about the 40 or so different fallacious and/or extremely-weak arguments that I’ve already documented.
At some point I intend to post those, along with the information as to WHY they are fallacious and/ or extremely weak.
Your complaint about ad-hom "attacks" is itself an ad hom. Rejected.
I asked you a question. If you don't like Original Intent, then what do you like better?
People making our decisions for us from Zurich? International lotus-eaters in the White House? I'm talking about your motives here.
Ha! The pot calls the kettle, Black!
And Im not talking about the 40 or so different fallacious and/or extremely-weak arguments that Ive already documented Made up.
Fixed it for ya.