Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gluteus Maximus
I would add only that polygamy is a much, much smaller step away from traditional Christian marriage than "gay marriage." Polygamy was tolerated in the Bible, even mandated in the limited case of leverite marriage. Polygamy doesn't violate the natural law. Homosexual marriage does.

Fundamentally, there is one aspect of marriage which has been essentially universal throughout history among nearly all societies which continued to thrive after the death of their original founding members: every woman is recognized as either being unmarried, or having exactly one husband, and in the latter situation shall be forbidden from having sexual relations with anyone but the husband without the husband's consent (which he may very well never give). Every marriage must thus involve exactly one man and at least one woman. A union of two men would involve two men and zero women; a union of two women would be slightly less abnormal, and might conform to some societies' norms if the two women brought in a husband.

67 posted on 03/26/2013 4:20:53 PM PDT by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: supercat

Well put.


70 posted on 03/26/2013 10:47:40 PM PDT by Gluteus Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson