True, he admitted it on FNS to Chris Wallace when asked specifically. He was doing everything he could to avoid talking about it.
He SPECIFICALLY said that illegals could apply for US citizenship without leaving the country, that is a huge jump in line for them.
Plus he told that hispanic group that they are natural conservatives (really?), but forgot to mention to them he was going to propose days later eliminating those agencies and raising SS age.
If he believed what he says he would have pitched it to them. I would have respected him for that.
Cavuto asks Paul how his bill is different from Rubio bipartision bill, Paul replies that there are many similarities and here:
Rand from clip : “ I dont think they have a NEW pathway to citizenship. I think their bill like MY bill would say that you dont have to go home, you don't have to leave, if you been here for 10 years and you are working you dont have to go back to Mexico. But you do have to get in line, the same line as someone in Mexico City. So if someone in Mexico city wants to get in line to come to the US to be a citizen, then its the same as those we are going to give work visas to already here, they have to get in that same line. Not the front of the line the same line that already exists. Its kind of confusing when people say 'this is amnesty' or 'this is path citizenship'....... ”
Its kind of confusing when you don't want us to know what you are supporting Rand.
You are talking about two lines Rand, one in Mexico city and one here in the US where they will get Obama-care. Stop lying and saying its THE SAME LINE!