Not only that .. but nobody seems to realize that the weapons were the property of the MOTHER. She was legally allowed to purchase such weapons. And, I might add, no registration form asks if you have mentally unstable people living in your home.
However, SHE WAS VERY CARELESS in handling her weapons, and she did not take the proper steps to protect those weapons from getting into the hands of her “disturbed” son.
I blame the mother .. not all normal gun owners. But, I’ve never heard one word in the press telling the truth about the mother’s lack of care of her weapons.
I also read that the mother told her son’s tutor, “... don’t turn your back on him ...”. What ..?? She’s afraid of her son and yet she still did not lock up her weapons from his reach ..??
I’m just amazed that nobody is talking about this .. but of course the dems/libs don’t want the public to discuss the truth, they want the public pointing fingers at gun owners, instead of an irresponsible mother.
I think most recognized Adam Lanza as being disturbed with at least some, namely his mother, believing him to be potentially dangerous. So yes, it is curious why someone who believed that about her son would leave weapons within his reach.