To: Joe Brower; Travis McGee; Carry_Okie
You know, myself and
many others have been on here
for years trying to educate others about the actual numbers needed to pass a treaty and how the Constitution is the
supreme law of the land no matter what.
And even after all this time people are still ignorant.
Do you guys think it's willful ignorance or deliberate attempts to confuse?
94 posted on
03/21/2013 5:17:35 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
It may be that there are a few hired to populate the threads with posts downplaying the hazards. At this point, I try to get something in early. Failing that, I'll collect names and post to all of them. I almost never get a reply. Sometimes they'll crank up a new one. That's when it's really telling. I can't be doing this full time.
I can say for a fact that it was a pattern on California threads during the recall of Gray Davis and that it appeared to me they were hired GOPe operatives. It was just too repeatable. I can't say I've seen a pattern that consistent with these Small Arms Treaty threads.
100 posted on
03/21/2013 7:01:34 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
To: philman_36
This government does not follow the Constitution anyway. You have convinced me that your analysis is correct, but what difference does it make if the current tyrants ignore the Constitution? In practice the Constitution now only means whatever five or more Supreme Court justices say it means. Reality and legality mean less and less everyday, and these damn tyrants in D.C. will do whatever they think they can get by with. Tyrants and criminals by their very nature do not follow the law; therefore, it is incumbent upon us to make clear to them what kind of price they will pay.
109 posted on
03/23/2013 10:05:57 PM PDT by
Jay Redhawk
(Zombies are just intelligent, good looking democrats.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson