Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

Get something straight. Starving horses are being neglected, they are not the ones headed to slaughter, particularly slaughter for human consumption. Slaughter buyers don’t want bones, they want nice healthy fat ones - heavy ones... the bigger the better.

The existence of slaughter as an option has not, and will never, have one effect on people who are neglecting animals. Slaughter as a necessary solution to neglect is a myth... and a red herring.


119 posted on 03/21/2013 10:16:09 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: HairOfTheDog
The folks who take their horses to a national forest area are getting rid of the horses ~ they imagine they can eat grass and drink water and get along fine.

That's not what happens. But that sort of thing was not commonly seen BEFORE Congress failed to provide funds for horsemeat inspections.

The anti-horse slaughter crowd thought they'd eliminated the practice ~ instead, they made keeping, and disposing of horses, even more brutal than it had been.

121 posted on 03/21/2013 10:47:22 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson