Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ek_hornbeck

They are not representing the people and their ancestors who built and created those civilizations.

they are sworn to protect and defend the Constitution to God. They will have to answer to Him for that.

Amnesty is not Constitutional. If they believe the Constitution is racist and they don’t want to follow it for that reason, then they can appeal for an amendment.

But this mob rule business paves a dangerous path for the future.


351 posted on 03/20/2013 5:42:47 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]


To: stanne

Can the necessity for the abolition of the D&R party be doubted? There is no substantive difference.


352 posted on 03/20/2013 6:32:38 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

To: stanne
But this mob rule business paves a dangerous path for the future.

Pandering for votes is the logical outcome of mob rule, no question about it.

The irony of all this is that none of this pandering to Mexicans will pay off. In the end, they'll still vote overwhelmingly for Democrats because of food stamps, Medicaid, welfare, affirmative action, bilingual education, and "la Raza" activism.

So amnesty supporters like Rand will just enfranchise and give voting rights to the very people who will vote them him and other Republicans out of office.

355 posted on 03/20/2013 8:04:38 PM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson