You've been framing this from the very beginning that it wasn't really so bad, not really rape, just consent from 16 year old girl who was just as bad, or just as wrong as the boys; or alternatively journalism exactly like the Zimmerman case.
Now that they've been convicted of rape, you just keep on moving the goal posts, trying to defend what you said.
Same stubborn idiocy, just doubling down on it. Your default setting......
No, but I do understand how a person of you limited faculties has to shoehorn your opposition into such convenient little cliches.
I do entertain the possibility this the girl is not the victim self-appointed white knights like you make her out to be, and have risen to task of defending that position (without the use of hearsay, speculation, or self-serving hypotheticals, I might add).
Further, I have maintained the Zimmerman case should make us all wary of conviction by press account.
If that's "stupid" to you, you don't know what stupid means.
And for the record, you'd have a better chance of proving my stupidity if you'd stop stealing my idioms.