MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CLARIFICATION OF THE COURT’S ORDER DATED MARCH 4, 2013
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0313/motion_for_reconsideration.pdf
TODAY IS MONDAY 3/18 AND 84 DAYS UNTIL JUNE 10th
Today the defense team released a renewed motion for the deposition of Ben Crump. Included with the motion were 12 exhibits to support their argument:
1) Judge Nelson’s previous ruling denying the original motion
2) Copies of the audio files made by Ben Crump of the 3/19 wit 8 interview
3) E-Mail from Don West to BDLR (dated 8/23) regarding “discovery issues” that mentions the recordings made by Ben Crump
4) Letter from Don West to BDLR (dated 9/19) regarding “Zimmerman discovery” including the recordings made by Ben Crump
5) Excepts from BDLR’s 4/2 interview of wit 8 in which she “claimed” she went to the hospital
6) Ben Crump’s SWORN affidavit regarding the recording of wit 8, (claiming that ALL of his interview of wit 8 was included in the recordings he provided to the FDLE
7) Newly released audio recording made by ABC on 3/19 (includes a segment NOT provided to the FDLE by Ben Crump)
8) News video of Ben Crump on 3/20 playing the recorded statement of wit 8 for the cameras
9) News Video of Ben Crump discussing the recording on “In Session”stating that he was not hide anything or fight a deposition by claiming “work product” privilege (LOL)
10) Copy of Ben Crump’s letter (dated 4/2) to Roy Austin,the DAAG of the DOJ CRD announcing that he had “uncovered” new information in the investigation
11) Article from the OS in which Ben Crump says the police lied when they claimed Tracy Martin had said it was not his son’s voice on the 911 tape
12) Video of Ben Crump commenting on the news (in reference to the grainy SPD video)that the SPD police report was a fabrication.
Gee, it looks like Ben Crump has some “splainin’” to do!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSWWKe7IJEE
From Letjusticeprevail @
http://randomtopics.org/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=767&start=420
Page 6 #16 — ABC has a 25 minute recording of the Crump/DeeDee interview.
Is that in the possession of the defense yet???