Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: webstersII
Exactly.

Running the argument out with every possible counter argument would have shown where the argument is vulnerable. Doing this before making the argument will reveal whether the argument will stand or fall. If you realise it will fall - make a different argument.

Take Sandy Hook for instance, it would have been just as easy to kill as many kids with a car by running a group of them over, or by hijack a bus and ram it into a above ground fuel tank. That could happen just as often as mass murders with “assault rifles”. This argument illustrates the real problem as not being assault rifles, it's deranged individuals.

107 posted on 03/14/2013 10:53:08 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: dynoman
How do we defend the child porn vs gun types argument? To me it is just common sense that child porn is bad and gun types are not any more deadly than another.

Do we say that child porn is equal to bazookas (which we can't own)? I am wondering everyone's thoughts here.
127 posted on 03/14/2013 11:30:46 AM PDT by phalynx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson