To: Kartographer
I always like to ask if you was to go back to say 1928-9 and address a group of leading German Jewish professionals about what was going to happen to them and their people within the next ten years, what do you think their reaction would be? And I say the first one to use a NAZI analogy has lost the debate. You could also pick a thousand other times people have predicted doom and it didn't happen. Prudent perperation is great, but assuming the worst is inevitable is an overeaction, and not a great way to live your life, IMHO.
99 posted on
03/12/2013 3:42:39 PM PDT by
Hugin
To: Hugin
“And I say the first one to use a NAZI analogy has lost the debate”
Why? That is just debate tripe byt hose trying to seem experienced at debating. The fact is Nazi Germany is an excellent example to study. It wasn’t by any imagination a one-off situation but one of modern human history.
101 posted on
03/12/2013 4:29:44 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
To: Hugin
And I say the first one to use a NAZI analogy has lost the debate.Does the rule also apply if they use a Commie analogy?
To: Hugin
That’s the thing about opinions isn’t it.
I also noticed you didn’t amswer the question, the person that fails to directly answer the question in my experince is the one who lost the debate.
109 posted on
03/12/2013 5:34:43 PM PDT by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: Hugin
110 posted on
03/12/2013 5:35:29 PM PDT by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson