Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
Natual gas is C1..... Gasoline is complex blend generally C5 through C12. NG has a general combustion of 1030 btu/scf, and if my memory serves correctly (and with liquid to gas conversion) gasoline has significantly less latent heat of combustion, ie therefore many more carbon atoms needed to get the same result.

But also remember.... 99+% of vehicles in the US do not run on NG. And from my persepctive, I am not too hip on having a NG cylinder strapped to my vehicle.

If the technology is truly there to cost effectively convert NG to gasoline..... this will be a true game changer.

15 posted on 03/11/2013 11:43:29 AM PDT by catfish1957 (My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: catfish1957; thackney

I would think “cost effectively” is the key term here. Conversion of natural gas to gasoline in a pilot plant is one thing, conversion on a commerical scale to make it worthwhile is a different matter.


16 posted on 03/11/2013 11:50:35 AM PDT by henkster (I have one more cow than my neighbor. I am a kulak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson