Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Friedman: No to Keystone. Yes to Crazy.
New York Times ^ | 03/10/2013 | Tom Friedman

Posted on 03/10/2013 5:30:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

I HOPE the president turns down the Keystone XL oil pipeline. (Who wants the U.S. to facilitate the dirtiest extraction of the dirtiest crude from tar sands in Canada’s far north?) But I don’t think he will. So I hope that Bill McKibben and his 350.org coalition go crazy. I’m talking chain-themselves-to-the-White-House-fence-stop-traffic-at-the-Capitol kind of crazy, because I think if we all make enough noise about this, we might be able to trade a lousy Keystone pipeline for some really good systemic responses to climate change.

We don’t get such an opportunity often — namely, a second-term Democratic president who is under heavy pressure to approve a pipeline to create some jobs but who also has a green base that he can’t ignore. So cue up the protests, and pay no attention to people counseling rational and mature behavior. We need the president to be able to say to the G.O.P. oil lobby, “I’m going to approve this, but it will kill me with my base. Sasha and Malia won’t even be talking to me, so I’ve got to get something really big in return.”

Face it: The last four years have been a net setback for the green movement. While President Obama deserves real praise for passing a historic increase in vehicle mileage efficiency and limits on the emissions of new coal-fired power plants, the president also chose to remove the term “climate change” from his public discourse and kept his talented team of environmentalists in a witness-protection program, banning them from the climate debate. This silence coincided with record numbers of extreme weather events — droughts and floods — and with a huge structural change in the energy marketplace.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; environmentalism; keystone; keystonexl; oil; pipeline; tomfriedman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: SeekAndFind

I read this earlier today. I thought it was satire.


21 posted on 03/10/2013 5:58:59 PM PDT by Dysart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000; beethovenfan

Thomas Friedman is an idiot


22 posted on 03/10/2013 6:04:45 PM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000
you left out “total”. you softening up a bit my friend?

It's Sunday - so I'm in lazyboy mode. Did a fridge run and now I'm recharged. And . . .

Thomas Friedman is still a total idiot.

23 posted on 03/10/2013 6:10:14 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dysart

Is it true that Tom Friedman’s prom date was Paul Krugman?


24 posted on 03/10/2013 6:33:18 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: chemical_boy

Yes, there are other crude oil pipelines from Canada to the US. But they all terminate in the mostly land-locked and crude-short Midwest (PADD III). Keystone would move cheap crude all the way to Houston, where it would trash the structure of world crude prices. Crude markets are already glutted and yet more crude flowing into the refining complex around Houston would force the Saudis and Russians to further reduce output to keep prices up.

Make no mistake about this: The problem with Keystone has nothing to do with environmental concerns. The real issue is from a US national security standpoint. It would put severe downward pressure on crude oil market prices, which the US has been successfully propping up for more than a decade as part of multi-pronged economic warfare against the Chinese. All the enviro yammering is just window dressing. It is geopolitics, national security and it is China.


25 posted on 03/10/2013 6:33:33 PM PDT by Tenega
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All

From what I understand, Mr. Friedman, the tar sands oil is already coming south. Transported by nobama’s BFF Warren Buffet via his railroad.

The pipeline will make transportation quicker and less costly. In addition to creating a slew of jobs, both short term (building) and long term (maintenance).

I read an article recently, sorry, I don’t have a link, wish I did, that said the amount of oil and natural gas right here in the US is more than what they’ve got in the Middle East. The US could become a net exporter of oil and gas. Plus, the reserve will hold us for 600 years.

I realize that tar sands and fracking scare the sh!t outta you mentally diseased greenie leftards with a windmill stuck up your butt. Just think: no more stupid electric cars, no more solar panels for as far as the eye can see, no more Eagle killing windmills spoiling a beautiful view, no more taxpayer funding of rip-off “green” companies about to file bankruptcy. Too bad for you. Go suck on it.


26 posted on 03/10/2013 6:35:26 PM PDT by upchuck (Waiting, hoping, begging for the straw. Time to bring pent up frustration to fruition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

House so big...


27 posted on 03/10/2013 6:41:26 PM PDT by Flick Lives (We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Brain so small..


28 posted on 03/10/2013 6:41:30 PM PDT by Flick Lives (We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Thomas Friedman has them all.


29 posted on 03/10/2013 6:41:33 PM PDT by Flick Lives (We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Burma Shave


30 posted on 03/10/2013 6:41:37 PM PDT by Flick Lives (We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

New York, imports and the debt regime, scheming to increase imports by way of a cheap Canadian dollar. The anti-American crooks in the northeast will keep it up, until our country collapses. No thanks. Let’s buy extra oil from Canada instead of the Middle East, and start producing more useful things on US soil again.


31 posted on 03/10/2013 6:45:08 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Isn’t he the guy who makes his living mowing down trees for newsprint?


32 posted on 03/10/2013 6:50:13 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Burma Shave bump! I remember reading those signs as a kid. Hilarious!


33 posted on 03/10/2013 6:58:52 PM PDT by upchuck (Waiting, hoping, begging for the straw. Time to bring pent up frustration to fruition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Not sure. But they would make a cute couple, that’s for sure. Soulmates.


34 posted on 03/10/2013 6:59:44 PM PDT by Dysart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
LOL! I can hardly believe that fossilized old communist fart Friedman is still writing.
Of course, the New York Times will publish anything that shows fascism and communism in a positive light.
35 posted on 03/10/2013 7:01:54 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Friedman’s face is in the dictionary accompanying the word “hypocrite”.


36 posted on 03/10/2013 7:04:18 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I used to get him and Paul Krugman mixed up. I wonder why. /s


37 posted on 03/10/2013 7:08:10 PM PDT by willk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

That pool doesn’t heat itself.


38 posted on 03/10/2013 7:42:31 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m pretty sure Tom Friedman is an idiot.


39 posted on 03/10/2013 7:45:55 PM PDT by BillyBonebrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

In my Roget’s thesaurus, ‘Thomas L. Friedman’ is listed as an antonym to ‘introspection’


40 posted on 03/10/2013 7:46:11 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson