Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge
It depends on who they nominated and how the campaign went. Lincoln was an unknown quality and there was a certain quotient of luck in his victory.

Also, regional politics played an important role. Lincoln checked Douglas in his own region and handily carried the Northeast.

If Seward had been nominated, a Democrat could have picked up votes in the Old Northwest. With Southern votes such a Democrat could have won. Conversely, a New Yorker like Seymour just possibly could have beaten Lincoln.

457 posted on 03/14/2013 5:52:19 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies ]


To: x

I guess my point is here.

Grant, Hayes, Garfield, Arthur, Harrison, Cleveland, McKinley, Roosevelt, Taft.

9 presidents, from 1868 to 1912, everyone of them were from NY or Ohio.

Failed candidates:

Parker (New York), Seymour (Ohio), Greeley (New York), Tilden (New York),

Bryan (Illinois), Hancock (Pennsylvania), Blaine (Pennsylvania),


458 posted on 03/14/2013 6:01:42 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson