Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamAdams76
So I'm not really arguing that the 19th Amendment be repealed (a dead issue anyhow as it would never happen) but for men as a whole to re-assume their role as protectors/providers for women and children.

How do you propose men "re-assume" a role with women in which women refuse to participate.

95 posted on 03/09/2013 9:37:27 AM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger
Well men should not mate with such women, nor should they donate to sperm banks. The result will be that those type of women will eventually become de-populated as they will not be able to reproduce without benefit of male sperm.

Fortunately, many women out there are more than adequate for men to establish long-term romantic/sexual relationships with that ultimately lead to procreation. There just isn't enough quality men to go around for them.

98 posted on 03/09/2013 9:43:17 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson