To: JohnPDuncan
What’s the point? He’ll probably end up voting for him anyway, like he did Hagel.
2 posted on
03/06/2013 9:04:29 AM PST by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Truth/Lies; Liberty/Tyranny--WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE??)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
What’s the point? He’ll probably end up voting for him anyway, like he did Hagel.Bingo! I'm not getting fooled again.
6 posted on
03/06/2013 9:09:00 AM PST by
dfwgator
To: rightwingintelligentsia
He’ll probably end up voting for him anyway, like he did Hagel.He voted for John Kerry, too.
7 posted on
03/06/2013 9:13:02 AM PST by
yorkie
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I think his vote for hagel was more of an in your face, upside the head slap at the republican leadership for not supporting his vote to NOT allow cloture. Had they supported him, hagel would not have been confirmed. He was very angry.
11 posted on
03/06/2013 9:18:48 AM PST by
MestaMachine
(Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I doubt it. Paul and Hagel have something in common in they both have a strong noninterventionist streak.
18 posted on
03/06/2013 9:27:27 AM PST by
jpl
(The government spent another half a million bucks in the time it just took you to read this tagline.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
What’s the point? He’ll probably end up voting for him anyway, like he did Hagel. I'll put you in the pro-Brennan column.
35 posted on
03/06/2013 10:30:03 AM PST by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson