1 posted on
02/27/2013 1:27:46 PM PST by
Red Steel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Red Steel
These people are mad to try to control others so closely.
2 posted on
02/27/2013 1:30:41 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: Red Steel
Bite me, commies! The law means nothing to you so don’t expect it to mean anything to me.
3 posted on
02/27/2013 1:33:52 PM PST by
TigersEye
(The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
To: Red Steel
“The effect is that everyone in the chain will be responsible for the actions of that gun.”
You know, the gun that walks around by itself and shoots people randomly.
Another incredibly stupid politician.
4 posted on
02/27/2013 1:36:21 PM PST by
headstamp 2
(What would Scooby do?)
To: Red Steel
Let me know when they propose making automobile, beer and other suppliers accountable when their products are misused.
5 posted on
02/27/2013 1:37:13 PM PST by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: Red Steel
Why not mandate personal liability insurance coverage for lawmakers who vote for laws which are enacted but then later overturned by high courts for being unconstitutional.
7 posted on
02/27/2013 1:40:49 PM PST by
Ron H.
(Hussein Obama, the 21st century American Balkanizer - 'Yes I Can')
To: Red Steel
So, will Colorado sellers of beer, wine and liquor be responsible if someone they sell to drives drunk and causes an accident?
To: Red Steel
I got transferred here back in 1991 and considered Colorado home. Looking into Wyoming. There will go 6 jobs and some pretty hefty taxes we pay.
11 posted on
02/27/2013 1:50:33 PM PST by
x1stcav
(Man up! We're all going to have to become Samuel Whittemores.)
To: Red Steel
That is what the registration is all about, making it easier to trace the owner of the gun and make him liable for any crimes that take place using his gun if it is still registered to him.
12 posted on
02/27/2013 1:52:07 PM PST by
Eva
To: Red Steel
How about liability insurance for paroled felons that reoffend and hurt others? I’d like to see judges and lawyers held accountable for their reckless actions.
13 posted on
02/27/2013 1:55:49 PM PST by
GP100
To: Red Steel
When they do this with cars, maybe-—NOT!
15 posted on
02/27/2013 2:07:33 PM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: Red Steel
This wouldn’t apply to 99% of the firearms owners because ASSAULT weapons are full auto, not semi-automatic.
16 posted on
02/27/2013 2:30:42 PM PST by
Renegade
To: Red Steel
The sellers part is too ridiculous for words and violates Federal law protection gun sellers and manufacturers from these frivolous lawsuits.
As for the owners part, if someone grossly negiligent in letting a person they know is likely to harm others use their weapon (”assault” or otherwise) car, hammer, cigarette lighter or whatever, they could already be held liable. Other than that, I have a novel idea, why not hold the MURDERERS liable?
How about a law holding Gun Grabbing politicians personally liable for all people killed or injured in “gun free zones” that they either voted for or failed to vote for the repeal of, in any case where it is reasonably likely that an armed citizen could have prevented the attack or reduced the injury and/or death toll?
To: Red Steel
everyone in the chain will be responsible for the actions of that gun Words fail me.
An uncommon occurrence - ask my wife.
19 posted on
02/27/2013 2:51:35 PM PST by
grobdriver
(Vivere liberi aut mori)
To: Red Steel
These guys don’t seem to know the difference between -criminal- and -civil- actions. As a civil matter, owners are already liable for the damage they do with their guns. There is nothing for a legislature to do.
20 posted on
02/27/2013 3:18:34 PM PST by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
To: Red Steel
"Morse says jurors would decide whether sellers or owners should be held liable in individual cases."
Colorado jurors. Anyone thinking about letting that bill pass had best think again. Consider the "first settler syndrome" in CO too (established residents on the Range doing anything they can to have others forced back off of the Range). Consider the regulations in general, too (regulations against building, tiny manufacturing operations and many other productive activities: communistic).
21 posted on
02/27/2013 3:26:33 PM PST by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: Red Steel
"Republicans have also said Morse's idea may conflict with a 2005 federal law that protects gun makers and sellers from liability for crimes committed with their products."
Everyone will know that as a class war attack. For the time being, many people can easily afford to buy $1,000,000+ coverage for each firearm and would much rather have that kind of situation--especially in CO (disarming all of the lower income trash). Any of you considering letting it pass, should think again on that, too.
The likelihood of a bond collapse, skyrocketing interest rates, debt repudiation and currency adjustment is very high in the very near future. There won't be many well-to-do folks after that except for a few remaining in high government positions ("essentials").
See the complete outlawing of all firearms ahead for everyone, including pistols (retaliation from outlawed voters). Also remember the ingenuity that remains in people who repair and build for themselves. Such people can find their legal way around just about any regulations.
22 posted on
02/27/2013 3:42:13 PM PST by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: Red Steel
Notice how none of these laws affect the thugs and shooters in the inner cities?
23 posted on
02/27/2013 3:48:33 PM PST by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: Red Steel
I say go for, but have poll taxes back first.
To: Red Steel
Let me know when this A$$hat passes a law that holds Rambo SWAT teams liable for kicking down the wrong door in the middle of the night.
And the moron judge who approved the move.
And the individual wannabe’s who did the deed. (especially the A$$wipe who gets “skeeerd” and shoots the dog.)
And the idiot DA who thought it was “A Good Ideeea!”
Till then bung face, keep your slimy fingers off my hardware.
(Not talking to you RS!)
27 posted on
02/27/2013 4:06:23 PM PST by
ConradofMontferrat
(According to mudslymz, my handle is a HATE CRIME. And I HOPE they don't like it.)
To: Red Steel
Hmm, what amuses me about stuff like this is that the people who push it would howl like banshees if it was suggested all homosexuals or all blacks should be punished for the actions of a few.
31 posted on
02/27/2013 6:02:46 PM PST by
RWB Patriot
("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson