To: Mr. Know It All
“Are you implying that states don’t have the right to regulate commerce within their borders? “
Since when does two men sticking things in places it doesn’t go “Commerce”?
158 posted on
02/27/2013 5:34:15 AM PST by
Darksheare
(Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
To: Darksheare
Since when does two men sticking things in places it doesnt go Commerce?
Silly... That's not "commerce", That's Connect ;) (in an ugly fudge packing way.. ewww :/)..
176 posted on
02/27/2013 7:16:03 AM PST by
Bikkuri
(Hope for Conservative push in the next 2-4 years..........)
To: Darksheare; Mr. Know It All
Maybe the poster, who I take it, has been zapped, was thinking about two men trading feces with each other using their penises as an act of commerce. I guess females were trading vaginal fluids too, so this was considered commerce.
Either way, the expansion of the definition of commerce has been roundly bastardized so that argument could fly in today's legal world. One would need to look up the State's individual Constitution; I would have used that argument. Also Amended clauses, not through case law.
178 posted on
02/27/2013 7:26:47 AM PST by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson