Dispatch International: "Joe McCarthy Was Right All Along"

Diana West ^ | 1/25/2013

[Altura Ct.]

I cannot overestimate the fearless excellence of M. Stanton Evans' work as a historian, and, I am fortunate to say, mentor. His 2007 book Blacklisted by History is not only a shattering revision of half a century of lies about Joseph McCarthy and "McCarthyism" -- and, by extension, obfuscation about the successful penetration and subversion of the US government -- it is also an exercise in courage, in confronting a false and crippling consensus with an unshakeable dedication to fact and logic. On a personal note, the book served me as a rosetta stone by which I was able to begin deciphering the mendacious history we "know" as our shining cultural legacy. The results of this unnerving research-odyssey will be published in my forthcoming book, American Betrayal.

That said, I am delighted to post an article written for this week's edition of Dispatch International. My task was to introduce a European audience, in brief, to Evans' work. The piece below is the main article, which is available for free at the DI website. I also wrote accompanying piece assembling a series of thumbnail sketches of some of the sensational revelations Evans and co-writer and Cold War expert Herbert Romerstein discovered in their brand new book, Stalin's Secret Agents. It is behind the online-subscription wall -- so subscribe!

"Joe McCarthy Was Right All Along"

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Most Europeans are unlikely to be familiar with the facts behind the American term “McCarthyism.” They probably know it describes something very bad in American politics – the “Communist witch hunts” of more than half a century ago. They may also know that simply uttering the term, like casting a spell, stops all debate cold by associating someone with the eponymous Joseph McCarthy. As the story goes, he was himself very bad. After all, he conducted those long ago “Communist witch hunts,“ ruining his name in perpetuity. This probably exhausts general knowledge.

But here’s a secret: Most Americans know little more than this same familiar but completely false narrative. In recent years, stunning revelations from archives in Washington and Moscow have confirmed that McCarthy’s investigations – and those conducted by other officials before and after – netted not innocent and imaginary “witches,” but secret cadres of hardened Communist agents determined to bring down the American republic. Surely, this makes Joe McCarthy a great patriot and deserving “the plaudits of a grateful nation.”

So wrote M. Stanton Evans, the consensus-smashing, revisionist biographer of McCarthy in Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies (2007). Evans was attempting to convey the significance of just one particular Soviet intelligence operation, circa 1945, that McCarthy was instrumental in bringing to light, circa 1950.

Even a few details about this operation, named initially as the Amerasia affair after a pro-Communist journal of the day, will add a little needed context to modern-day perspective on the so-called McCarthy era.

Amerasia’s editor, Phillip Jaffe, came under FBI surveillance in 1944 after the contents of a confidential OSS memo appeared in his magazine. (The OSS was the precursor to the CIA.) The FBI soon learned Jaffe was in possession of hundreds of stolen, secret US government documents, plus a photographic set-up. The magazine ran no photographs, so the FBI plausibly believed it had come across an active espionage operation. Further surveillance, including wire-taps, determined that Jaffe was in frequent contact with US Communist Party leader Earl Browder, Soviet “diplomats” in New York, a top Chinese Communist envoy of Mao and US diplomat John Stewart Service (home from Chiang Kai-Shek’s China, where, it later emerged, Service roomed with two leading Communist agents, Solomon Adler and Chi Chao-ting).

On June 6, 1945, FBI agents arrested six people, including Jaffe and Service, and seized hundreds of top secret documents, many concerning military matters. An open-and-shut espionage case, it would seem.

An open and quickly shut-down case is more like it. What followed was cover-up, perjury and grand-jury rigging by, among others, high-ranking Washington officials. Some were eager to prevent a national security scandal from engulfing the Truman White House. Others were acting to shield a far wider Communist-led conspiracy mounted by confederates inside the State Department, Treasury, White House and elsewhere in the US government, working not merely to filch secret documents but to ensure, through influence and subversion, the Communist takeover of China. These powerful forces of suppression proved overwhelming. The Amerasia case was scuttled, the scandal was buried, and, within a few years, China was Red.

Five years later, McCarthy’s laser-beam focus on the still-festering case would be instrumental in follow-up investigations launched by both the Senate and the FBI. These massive probes yielded, as Evans notes, some 5,000 pages of Senate hearings, plus 1,000 pages of exhibits and, from the FBI, 24,000 pages of now-declassified records.

They reveal the workings of a vast, complex influence operation, Evans writes, that “assiduously worked to guide official and public thinking, and hence the course of U.S. policy,” in this case regarding the Far East. Other such intricate influence operations, of course, targeted the West. And who was doing this dirty work of Communist-directed subversion from within? Many officials and public figures highlighted by Joseph McCarthy (among others), who, we have since learned from US and Soviet archives, were secret agents and fellow-traveling supporters of Stalin.

McCarthy, as Evans has pointed out, threatened to blow the lid off the official cover-ups and other acts of treason. Thus, he had to be isolated, demonized and destroyed, and so he was. History would be written by the isolators, the demonizers and the destroyers, and repeated by rote for the next half century.

Then along came the declassification of FBI records and releases of intelligence documents, and scholars such as M. Stanton Evans to sift through them. But the far-reaching implications of such research – that anti-Communist “witch-hunters” were right all along – have done shockingly little to change the way Americans regard their history. Such hidebound attitudes extend also to American conservatives, who, it would seem, are the modern-day heirs of the anti-Communist legacy. What Evans calls “court history” is that deeply entrenched as national lore.

Will this ever change? “There’s no concise answer to that,” Evans replied in a recent interview with Dispatch International. “There is a mindset, a narrative, a template that has been out there for a long time.” The reflex reaction, to date, is to preserve that template rather than assess the new evidence.

Thus, it is minimized or denied. Evans mimics the usual reaction to the specter of historical Communist penetration: “ `Well, this thing was overblown, there wasn’t a big problem, these people were persecuted.’ The new evidence, he continues, “challenges this so they dismiss it. We’re dealing with an establishment mindset that is impervious to refutation – to fact. It’s like throwing popcorn at a battleship.”

This hasn’t stopped Evans, 78 – once the youngest metropolitan newspaper editor in the USA (Indianapolis News), and formerly a columnist for the Los Angeles Times and commentator for CBS News and Voice of America – from reloading and firing again. In fact, following his McCarthy book, which corroborates many McCarthy cases and documents the Washington Establishment’s craven efforts to destroy the maverick senator rather than address subversion and cover-up, Evans embarked on a new project. With so much evidence now available attesting to the presence of Soviet agents watching over wartime Washington, Evans set out to write a concise history of what it was these agents of the Kremlin actually accomplished.

The new book, published in November 2012, is Stalin’s Secret Agents: The Subversion of Roosevelt’s Government, co-written with Herbert Romerstein, a leading Cold War expert and longtime congressional investigator. Assessing the achievements of agents of influence, is very different, Evans emphasizes, from standard histories of spying as defined by stealing secrets.

The series of history-changing events Evans and Romerstein identify as having been subverted by Soviet agents is itself history-changing, demanding a rewrite of much of the history of World War II. Despite the familiarity with which we regard the era, in many ways, Evans and Romerstein are pioneering a new field of study. The best way to approach it with what Evans himself calls his Law of Inadequate Paranoia: “No matter how bad you think something is,” he says, “when you look into it, it's always worse."

[kabumpo]

yes, it is why it happened to him, but Nixon was also a sellout - giving diplomatic recognition to China was not a good move. Now we have thousands of U.S. businesses endorsing the oppression and tyranny there, using the slave labor of political pisoners.

[sneakers]

bttt

[VR-21]

"I have read “Double Lives” and given it to several people."

Excellent Kabumpo! I have as well, and every one I've given it to has told me that they were affected by it.

I must give credit to another writer named Kent Clizbe. He's a former CIA officer who wrote a good book titled Willing Accomplices, and with whom I exchanged a few e-mails. Prior to reading his book, all I knew about Munzenberg was from a book titled The Red Millionaire by Sean McMeekin which (in Clizbe's words) was little more than a biographical time-line. I agree with him, and wouldn't recommend that book. Clizbe's book and my subsequent correspondence with him revealed to me that there was much much more to learn about Munzenberg. It was also his book's references that compelled me to read Double Lives. What I learned about Alexander Gumberg, George S. Counts and the Teachers College at Columbia University alone made Willing Accomplices worthwhile for me.

[VR-21]

I did say "a grudging respect," and you have to admit...Munzenbergs man Otto Katz did play those "idiot intellectuals" like country fiddles.

[LucyT]

*

. . . . Ping. - TM, too.

Evans' Law of Inadequate Paranoia: “No matter how bad you think something is, when you look into it, it's always worse."

Brilliantly, brilliantly brilliant comment about one of the Biggest of the Big Lies that have become enshrined in the socialist takeover of the U.S.

Even though Ann Coulter was the first to try to break this news (ten years ago, in Treason), all of us who care, who blog, who can influence the speech or writing of Republicans, who have connections to prominent conservatives, who can contact journalists, bloggers and broadcasters and demand that this story be covered, should do so again and again.

The parallels to our present-day infiltration by islamists to consolidate the caliphate in the middle east, just as the infiltrators of the 50s gave cover for the consolidation of communism in China, are striking. Please give this article, and your contribution to getting the news out, some serious thought and action.

Thanks, Albion Wilde.

.

[Gertie]

It's scary when you realize that the entire Korean “deal” was hashed out 60 years ago and it is obvious that our negotiating team was comprimised, we as a nation, need an audit system and an end to this idea that political payback includes a gov’t job. If the Post Office ran like an everyday main street business, most of it's problems would be handled.

[Syncro]

Spittle mouth Matthews was comparing Cruz to McCarthy and trying to make it look bad.

Har, everything he was complaining about I was going YES, right on McC and Cruz!

[Navy Patriot]

You be right, Nixon made a lot of mistakes, more than you list, and many helped the Commies (EPA).

Commies are trained by, and work for, the best liar in the history of the world, and many people get taken in more than once.

[PGalt]

Thanks for the pings; thread and book recommendations. BTTT!

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[kabumpo]

thank you for your recommendation. I will read it.

[VR-21]

I'd be very interested in knowing what you think of it. You won't learn anything new about Munzenberg, as Double Lives gave considerably more detail about his life and work. Clizbe's book is more of a primer on the KGB's "active measures" which is the name they gave their disinformation/subversion efforts in the West. He refers to "ideological payloads" they delivered to the influential segments of our society. He also has a website too, it's www.willingaccomplices.com and it tells you more about the book and himself. Take care.

[onyx]

BTTT
Senator McCarthy was a saint in our house.
Saving.

[kabumpo]

”Active measures are exactly what interest me. Can’t wait to read it. Thanks again.

[bonfire]

In mine as well, onyx.

bumping for all the great book recommendations.

[exPBRrat]

I remember that too, thank you for pointing that out.

[exPBRrat]

I remember that too, thank you for pointing that out.

[PhilDragoo]

I saw M. Stanton Evans, then-editor of the now-defunct Indianapolis News, destroy in debate Dr. Robert Risk of the Indiana Civil Liberties Union. We YAFers had a shouting match with Risk's bearded Marxist hangers-on. '64, heading for the New York YAF convention under Dick Allen to draft Goldwater only to lose to the incredibly bad LBJ.

Albion Wilde, this is so transparent, this Arab Spring, "Obama's" replacement of secular regimes with Islamist ones, using CIA and NATO and Saudi assets to arm the Muslim Brotherhood.

"Obama" is the natural Islamo-Communist tool, useful narcissist, seed of El Hajj Malik Al Shabazz our Sunni convert Malcolm.

Ann Coulter called Evans the greatest living authority on McCarthy. The Venona transcripts vindicate him.

Who lost China? Then Nixon and Henry went. Then Bill Clinton and Bernie Schwartz and C. Michael Armstrong gave them our missile secrets.

Wen Ho Lee with Bill Richardson's protection gave them our warhead secrets despite Notra Trulock's efforts.

Now they hack and hack as they warned in Unrestricted Warfare.

"Obama" will be more flexible with the KGB Stalinophile, slash our warhead stocks.

The people of America are the schools of fish of the Matrix or the soma-doped of Huxley.

The relevance of Evans' work is that the past is always prologue.

"Obama" brings the new radicalism.

[VR-21]

I’ve had a long and considerable interest in this subject, so if you come across something you consider worthwhile, please do tell me about it.

[Albion Wilde]

Who lost China? Then Nixon and Henry went. Then Bill Clinton and Bernie Schwartz and C. Michael Armstrong gave them our missile secrets.

Thanks for your interesting post. The Clinton era was largely a blur for me, so I was unaware of the Bernie Schwartz story. Had to look it up. Sounds like he was Bill Clinton's "Soros."

http://www.fas.org/news/china/1998/h980618-prc9.htm