[Tea Party Terrorist]

He should have been executed, but the fact that he was not does not negate the Constitution.

Solitary confinement with zero human contact is Cruel and Unusual punishment. You’re either for the Constitution or you’re not.

[hal ogen]

There is a simple lead solution which would take him out of “solitary”.

[Innovative]

“He should have been executed, but the fact that he was not does not negate the Constitution.

Solitary confinement with zero human contact is Cruel and Unusual punishment. You’re either for the Constitution or you’re not.”

Please point out the exact location in the Constitution, where it says that.

[RJS1950]

At least one person died as a result of his actions, by heart attack or otherwise, they still died. He should have never been treated as a criminal. Solitary for him is no more “cruel and unusual” than the dark, cold isolation of the grave. He has no Constitutional rights as a foreign combatant, regardless of what a POS democrat did to treat him as a criminal. Screw the son of a pig f’n dog.

FUBO & FAD

[philman_36]

Solitary confinement with zero human contact is Cruel and Unusual punishment.

How so? You make an assertion with no substantiation.

Your claim doesn't make your statement true just because you've voiced it.

Please provide something which verifies your assertion else your assertion is merely your opinion and you should state it as such, to wit...

In my opinion solitary confinement with zero human contact is Cruel and Unusual punishment.