[OneWingedShark]

The Indiana supreme reheard that case, and didn't back down. So, the Indiana legislature AGAIN passed a statute that recognized the right of the people to resist unlawful force in home entry, no matter who is exerting it. The Indiana Supreme court did not get the last word on that principle, although it endeavored mightily to do so; and can't be trusted to follow the law, in general, based on the original decision with completely overlooked the existing statutory framework.

IMO, the IN Supreme court should have been tried for felonies for that turd.

[Cboldt]

-- IMO, the IN Supreme court should have been tried for felonies for that turd. --

The legislature has the power of impeachment and removal, and should have exercised it. Even when the oversight was pointed out, the Indiana Supreme Court was defiant against the statutory law.