Replies

you don't justify their action in that particular instance;

That's correct, a particular instance. Unlike you criminal apologists that find the police at fault in every instance.

I gave you the lawful justification my mother could have used to drive off the officer

You go ahead and shoot at a police officer, neighbor kid, delivery person, standing on or crossing your property, and see what happens to you.

>> you don't justify their action in that particular instance;
>
> That's correct, a particular instance. Unlike you criminal apologists that find the police at fault in every instance.

I told you I'm a philosopher, I've made it clear I'm looking at the overall not a particular instance. How does that then make me a "criminal apologist", especially given that I've consistently been using Constitutions as my basis for reasoning?

I'm interested in the particulars of this instance, but the underlying philosophies present.

> I gave you the lawful justification my mother could have used to drive off the officer
>
> You go ahead and shoot at a police officer, neighbor kid, delivery person, standing on or crossing your property, and see what happens to you.

And you called me unbalanced!?
Where did I give any indication of shooting someone who wasn't breaking the law?