WTF -- I showed you the relevant constitutional sections when I built my argument, those are facts and evidence, yet you claim I need cases to cite them as violations.
IOW -- The Constitution itself isn't enough to mean what it says, no, we need the courts and judges to filter and hand down the words to us plebeian mites of that High Law just as priests are needed to hand down the Word of God.
Emotions are not a problem, it is emotion unbound by reason -- but likewise, reason unsoftened by emotion a problem:
"Reason without feeling is at best sterile and worst morally reprehensible.
Feeling without reason is at best animalistic and at worst insanity."
I love [sarcasm] how you can dismiss all the reason presented because I dare to show some emotional connection.
I bet if I presented it in a dry and formal manner you'd dismiss it as obviously uninteresting because it lacked emotional connection.
Did you ever attend college? Posting a book title, chapter title, amendment, page number or the US Constitution to address questions doesn't cut it.
we need the courts and judges
They are indeed part of the judicial branch of government, are they not?
I bet
Is it legal where you live?