So then you say that firing on officials acting contrary to the constitution that makes them official is unjustified? Does that mean that lawmen breaking the law is lawful?
Give me an example of your definition of "acting contrary to the constitution" and what lawful justification you would have in firing at LEOs. The question is, did Dorner have justification for firing at LEOs?
Does that mean that lawmen breaking the law is lawful?
It isn't lawful to break the law. However, emergency responders and LEOs do have authorization to do certain things that the general population would be arrested for doing. Does that mean that lawmen breaking the law is lawful?