LAPD, different incident which I've covered previously.
Dorner actually had some evidence
Pure speculation and conjecture. Do you believe he was so dumb that he wouldn't have "evidence" in safe keeping?
They were out to kill him, period, even without anyone shooting at them.
So far, you haven't provided a shred of evidence to support that allegation.
the LAPD
The LAPD and the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department are separate entities. Are you aware of that fact?
So is Game and Fish. Why was the FBI there HR?
Really? Is that why they have different names? Golly. I'd neverhavethunkit.
What first-hand knowledge do you have of any of this?
BTW, Nice clip of the question "Was that the fear of getting shot, or the fear that Dorner actually had some evidence that could blow some corrupt police out of the water? "
you didn't answer the (admittedly rhetorical) question, but that didn't stop you from butchering it into a statement. You could work for MSNBC, gee you're good.
If you routinely chop stuff up to suit your worldview, then I can fully understand your absence of understanding of Constitutional principle.