Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: greene66
The other problem is the whole time the firefight was going on, it was "believed" to be Dorner.

He was surprised by maids, tied them up, without hurting/killing them and fled in their vehicle.

He car jacked another man and allowed him to leave with his dog; again did not hurt the individual.

Then there is a firefight where the all along plan was to burn the building he's in to the ground.

It was "supposedly" and "allegedly" Dorner that the police were firing on and trying to burn alive. Whatever happened to Positive ID? You know like U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan need before engaging a target.

When did we grant police shoot on sight authority?

How did the police know Dorner did not have any hostages in the cabin, that did not belong to him? Dorner had already taken hostages earlier.

I'm not a conspiracy nut, but wasn't Dorner's badge and identification found the other day? Yet, the "proof" it was Dorner in the cabin was his driver' license was found. Okay, great it's Dorner. But, why do we need to wait until police are shooting at a fleeing individual, giving chase, and and innocent victim's property is intentionally torched before they have positive ID?

What if it had been someone resembling Dorner like a mexican newspaper delivery woman?

93 posted on 02/13/2013 4:35:47 PM PST by Repeat Offender (What good are conservative principles if we don't stand by them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Repeat Offender
I'm not a conspiracy nut,

Your post says otherwise.

101 posted on 02/13/2013 4:42:53 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson