Not from what I've seen here. Your consistent retreat to taking cover behind rhetorical "human shields" every time you are asked to answer a tough question, demonstrates as much. Not to mention your rather ham-handed accusations on your opponent's motivations.
Only a jack-booted thug, or shameless cop sucker, could contrive circumstances where an agent of the state burning someone alive is justifiable.
And that is exactly what you are doing.
What's next: holding a "suspect's" loved ones hostage? If you don't like the implicit "American" ROEs, find another job.
What tough questions. I've addressed all that are relevant to the thread subject.
jack-booted thug, or shameless cop sucker
I'll bet your eyes are brown.
What's next: holding a "suspect's" loved ones hostage?
Dorner went a little beyond that, didn't he? He killed the young daughter of a former cop and killed another cop leaving two young children fatherless. You pathetic criminal apologists make me want to puke.