I already know that one of these citations is completely false. And I’m pretty the rest are being mischaracterized. Start with Ankeny v. Daniels. It did NOT rule that Obama is a natural-born citizen. The Allen v. Obama citation you posted RELIES on this decison, but there is absolutely NO LEGAL PRECEDENT in Ankeny to support the claim by this judge. It simply is NOT there.
In Section B of the Ankeny v Daniels ruling, entitled “Natural Born Citizen” it states: “Based on the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the United States are ‘natural born citizens’ for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, November 12, 2009
The entire ruling can be read at:
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb
The “Natural Born Citizen” section of the ruling begins on Page 10. The quotation above is in specific reference to Barack Obama.
edge isn’t sane. He cannot read a single sentence without getting it backwards.
“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”