Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueLancer

“The railroad component of the argument, by itself, in my mind, would be sufficient to warrant the city’s destruction.”

The fact that there was one single living person in the city warrants its total destruction. The mere fact the city existed warranted its total destruction. It was war, not a civil matter but a military one. Kill everyone and destroy everything until the enemy ceases to exist or unconditionally surrenders; that is war.


44 posted on 02/13/2013 9:31:34 AM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

” It was war, not a civil matter but a military one. Kill everyone and destroy everything until the enemy ceases to exist or unconditionally surrenders; that is war.”

But the first law the of the winner’s history does not allow this concept to be applied to William T. Sherman.


79 posted on 02/13/2013 9:50:20 AM PST by Rebelbase ( .223, .224, whatever it takes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

An argument from the pit of hell.


114 posted on 02/13/2013 10:06:27 AM PST by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

Congratulations ! You just justified the nuking of an American city.


167 posted on 02/13/2013 10:51:35 AM PST by Kozak (The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson