Ass. How bout you leave FR?
So the police being judge, jury, and executioner is ok with you?
i don’t give a shit what he did. We have a such thing as due process. The fact that your pissed at me for questioning the practice of just killing someone without a trial just plain saddens me. Your no conservative.
You’re no conservative.
You’re welcome.
Did Dorner give himeself up? I must have missed that. Engaging an active shooter allows for the police (or a citizen, for that matter) to use self defense. I’m sure you’d be all for a citizen shooting someone, breaking into his house. Did that person get his miranda rights? No. And He shouldn’t have. I shouldn’t have to yell down the stairs that I will give him due process.
The USSC has also found the use of deadly force is lawful with conditions.
http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cjs04.htm
by John C. Hall, J.D.
Federal constitutional standards permit law enforcement officers to use deadly force to apprehend criminal suspects when there is "probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm...to the officer or to others..." and if deadly force "is necessary" to effect the apprehension.1 This formulation of the constitutional rule by the Supreme Court suggests two factors - dangerousness and necessity - as relevant to the question whether deadly force is constitutionally permissible.