Why Did Some Local Media Edit Out Anti-NRA, Pro-Obama Portions of Cop-Killer’s Supposed Manifesto?

http://www.theblaze.com ^ | February 7, 2013 | Madeleine Morgenstern

[NKP_Vet]

The supposed manifesto of a fired Los Angeles police officer being sought in several slayings contained praise for President Barack Obama and gun control and disdain for the National Rifle Association in portions apparently redacted at the request of the LAPD.

L.A. Fox affiliate KTTV-TV published a portion of Christopher Dorner’s writing that left out his political views. Other local news outlets including KTLA-TV and KFI AM 640 did the same

[Grandma Conservative]

Even assuming for the moment that those judges and juries were not liberals and did in fact arrive at the right verdicts, that just proves that Dorner could have taken a peaceful and legal route to what he claims was an injustice. Instead he murders three innocent people all because he says he lost his job(s) and his name was tarnished. Well, how clean is his name now that he is a triple murderer?

The suspect's father said that his son told him he was kicked. He did not actually witness the altercation.

Considering Dorner has murdered three innocent people, I can see why you wouldn't be too eager to consider his testimony.

Finally, Dorner could have brought a lawsuit against the LAPD. There are plenty of civil rights attornies that would love to take them on. He could have stopped at bringing his case to the media which whom is a big fan not to mention an ideological brethren of. Instead, he became a twisted vengeful psychopath (assuming he wasn't one already) and will most likely end up dead by his hands or others.

The only people being fooled are those who think Dorner is some kind of anti hero fighting the establishment. By Dorner's own manifesto, it is clear that he is on the side of the establishment at least in the bigger picture of things.

[Grandma Conservative]

The issue is not whether government, federal or otherwise is capable of abuse. Speaking for myself, I completely agree that the government should have been held accountable for its actions at Waco. One of the points I am trying to make is that the ends, holding those responsible accountable for injustices, does not justify the any means, the murder of people who had nothing to do with those injustices.

Chris Dorner attempts to justify the murder of three people as payback allegedly for his firing by the LAPD and tarnishing of his name. Tim McVeigh attempted to justify the murder of dozens of people including children for the injustices committed at the Branch Davidian compound. They allowed injustices real and perceived to turn them into monsters as bad as or even worse than those they declared war on. McVeigh's actions also led to a backlash against the right and the miltia movement in particular by the general population so much so that the movement had effectively collapsed by the late 90s. Dorner, to his benefit, has a sympathetic media on his side.

One last thing is that you do not negotiate with terrorists whether they are one-man murder squads like Dorner or an organization like al Qaeda.

[Navy Patriot]

...assuming for the moment that those judges and juries were not liberals and did in fact arrive at the right verdicts, that just proves...

My point that there is good reason to distrust and closely examine the LAPD.

Dorner could have taken a peaceful and legal route to what he claims was an injustice. Instead he murders three innocent people all because he says he lost his job(s) and his name was tarnished.

Ya wouldn't try to kid me, now would ya Grannie?

Considering Dorner has murdered three innocent people, I can see why you wouldn't be too eager to consider his testimony.

And I can see why YOU would like to misdirect attention to Dorner's testimony rather than the multiple legal decisions against the LAPD, and accuracy of information regarding LAPD, which is the subject of all my posts to you.

I would remind you that the subject of the thread is: Why Did Some Local Media Edit Out Anti-NRA, Pro-Obama Portions of Cop-Killer’s Supposed Manifesto? NOT DORNER

This is about the manipulation and suppression of information by the Statist Socialist LSM running cover for the Statist Socialist government in general and the reasons. NOT DORNER

The fact that Dorner is a bad guy in no way exonerates the LAPD from the illegal activities that resulted in court decisions against them, except in the minds of statist boot licking subjects.

Like the Edit Out Media, you would use the same device to edit out of the discussion the history of illegal acts by LAPD by misdirection to Dorner.

Dorner really bad, therefore LAPD always and forever good.

[diogenes ghost]

"Yes, silly evading you. Unable to defend your previous posts......."

Uhhhhh...right.....you DO know that was my FIRST post on the thread, right?

"...you attempt to sidetrack the conversation with an argument over semantics."

My 'attempt to sidetrack' was to point out that your semantics about 9/11 were incorrect, and sidetracked the conversation.

[jersey117]

They just happen to let guy escape to Mexico.

[Liberty Valance]

LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Bronco Bama.

[NKP_Vet]

Notice communist Van Jones in the background.

[longtermmemmory]

A criminal who hates armed citizens.

A police officers who hates armed citizens

Police are criminal.

[Chode]

what ever you say granny...