The gun-show loophole myth - FBI checks have to be fixed; new laws not needed on private gun sales

Washington Times ^ | January 30, 2013 | Emily Miller

[Vinnie]

Then, logically, there is another agenda besides preventing gun violence.
Why does no one confront the libs with this?

The rank and file man on the street lib thinks the idea of the mother (liberal) government turning on the citizens is, is inconceivable.
That folks even thinking that are paranoid.

Now if a republican administration is in office they have those paranoid thoughts also.

[MrB]

Yep, due to their humanism, libs assume benevolence on the part of those elite enough to seek “public service”, ie, politics,

except if those seeking power have any sort of standard of judgement based in Christianity,

then they are to be feared.

[longtermmemmory]

is anyone paying attention to the “keeping records rule”?

I think they are after keeping all checks permanent.

If anything any check record should be limited EVEN FURTHER and such records be 100% not public and ONLY public after a search warrent.

(also reform these ham sandwich judges)

[Atlas Sneezed]

Federally-licensed firearms dealers must run background checks for *all* purchases, whether at their shop, or at a gunshow, or anywhere else.

All other gun sellers may sell to lawful buyers *without* a background check, whether at home, in a parking lot, at a gunshow, (or a dog show) or anywhere else. There is nothing special about a gun show that exempts anyone from current laws.

Of course, gun shows are places where citizens gather to talk about the tyranny they face, which is what really gets under their skin.